Suppression of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by cannabinoids in a canine osteosarcoma cell line


Figueiredo AS, García-Crescioni HJ, Bulla SC, Ross MK, McIntosh C, Lunsford K, Bulla C "Suppression of vascular endothelial growth factor expression by cannabinoids in a

canine osteosarcoma cell line", Published 8 July 2013,

                                                      DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S41151


Abstract: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key regulator in both physiologic
and pathologic angiogenesis, and cannabinoids decrease VEGF release in human and murine
cancer cells. The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro effects of a synthetic cannabinoid,
WIN-55,212-2, on the expression of the proangiogenic factor VEGF-A in the canine osteosarcoma
cell line 8. After analysis of gene expression by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction,
the compound decreased VEGF-A expression by 35% ± 10% (P , 0.0001) as compared with
the control. This synthetic cannabinoid shows promise as a potential inhibitor of angiogenesis,
and further studies are warranted to investigate its in vivo effects and to explore the potential
of this and related compounds as adjuvant cancer therapy in the dog.
Keywords: dog, cancer, angiogenesis, cannabinoids

 

Introduction

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a proangiogenic signaling protein that induces proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells. The VEGF family comprises several glycoproteins, including VEGF-A, which is a major regulator of normal and abnormal angiogenesis.1 It plays a key role in tumor angiogenesis and has been found to be overexpressed in malignant tumors.2 Neoplastic tumors are dependent on angiogenesis because the formation of new blood vessels is required for delivery of the necessary nutrients and oxygen. In the absence of angiogenesis, tumors cannot grow larger than approximately 2 mm in diameter. Cells in rapidly growing masses are triggered by hypoxia to increase cellular VEGF expression in order to induce new vessel growth.3 Endocannabinoids, phytocannabinoids, and synthetic cannabinoids bind to cannabinoid 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2) receptors,4 and can inhibit tumor growth in several cancers, including mouse glioma,5 and human pancreatic,6 the uterine,7 and prostatic

cancer.8 CB1 and CB2 receptors are found in many tissues in mammals,4 including the bone cells of human9

and mouse10 species. WIN-55,212-2 is a synthetic cannabinoid that binds to both CB1 and CB2 receptors and had been demonstrated to impede angiogenesis, induce apoptosis in mouse cancer cells,9 and inhibit VEGF expression

in both human and mouse cancer cells.11,12

Cancer biology and tumor behavior have been shown to be similar in humans and dogs for several common cancers,13 and the dog is emerging as a valuable naturally occurring cancer model.14 Examples of these similarities are the canine and human leukemias and lymphomas, that have a similar clinical presentation, tumor biology, and response to therapy, and have been demonstrated to share evolutionary conserved chromosomal aberrations and conserved mutations within key oncogenes.15 Mammary malignancies share the same pattern of deregulated genes.16 Specifically, studies conducted with canine osteosarcoma were the first to yield results applicable to humans.17 The similarities between osteosarcoma in both species include a large patient size, 75% or more cases
affecting the appendicular skeleton, metaphyseal location, less than 10% of patients having documented metastasis
at presentation, over 90% of tumors showing high-grade histology, 75% of tumors showing aneuploidy, the metastatic
rate being 80% or more with amputation alone, the lung being the most common site of metastasis, and improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy,18 as well as deregulation of key cellular proteins, like STAT3.19 Recently, the study of molecular profiles derived from canine osteosarcoma helped to group complex human osteosarcoma into biologically and clinically relevant molecular subtypes.20

Despite aggressive treatment including surgery and chemotherapy, little improvement in survival time has been achieved in either humans or dogs.21,22 Added to the great importance of osteosarcoma in both humans and dogs described above is the fact that VEGF levels are predictive of pulmonary metastasis and a poor prognosis in human osteosarcoma,23 leading to the hypothesis that impairment of the proangiogenic pathway with cannabinoids can improve the prognosis of the disease.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no published studies evaluating VEGF levels in canine osteosarcoma or
the effects of cannabinoids in canine cancer or on canine tumor cells. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the
impact of treatment with WIN-55,212-2 on VEGF-A expression in the canine osteosarcoma 8 (OSA-8) cell line.20 To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study using a canine model to evaluate the possible use of cannabinoids to impair angiogenesis in osteosarcoma.

 

Materials and methods
The OSA-8 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 0.2% Primocin (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), and 1% HEPES (BioReagent, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). Twenty-four hours before the experiments, 8 × 106
 cells were seeded per well. A stock solution of WIN-55,212-2 (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was prepared in dimethylsulfoxide (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA). The solution was added to OSA-8 cells to a final concentration of 1 µM in supplemented Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium and incubated for 48 hours (n = 8). Control incubations (n = 6) had the same dimethylsulfoxide content of 0.1% (v/v). Three independent experiments were performed.

After total RNA extraction (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), RNA quality and concentration was evaluated by spectrophotometry. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed by a one-step reaction with a primer pair and labeled probe specific for canine VEGF-A (TaqMan Gene Expression Assay, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

A specific canine GAPDH primer pair and labeled probe (Eurofins MWG Operon, Huntsville, AL, USA) was designed
for normalization purposes. It was demonstrated to be a suitable gene for normalization under the experimental conditions after following procedures described elsewhere.24 GAPDH was considered to be stably expressed during the experiment on the basis of a −1.068-fold change because of treatment and checked by the Student’s t-test with a P value of 0.48.

The comparative quantification method was used for relative quantification25 and all samples were run in triplicate. The amplification efficiencies were analyzed by 10-fold dilution of a series of pooled RNA samples by 96.3% and 99.9% for VEGF-A and GAPDH, respectively.

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The statistical analysis was done by analysis of variance followed by the Student’s t-test26 using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA). A value of P , 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

 

Results
As shown in Figure1, OSA-8cells incubated with WIN-55,212-2 for 48 hours showed a decrease in VEGF-A expression by 35% ± 10% on average (P , 0.0001) compared with the control (dimethyl sulfoxide), which was 100% ± 23%.

 

Discussion
In this paper, we detail the use of a highly sensitive and specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction method for initial assessment of VEGF-A mRNA levels in a canine tumor cell line following treatment with a cannabinoid. We have demonstrated that WIN-55,212-2 decreased VEGF-A expression in the cultured OSA-8 cells by 35%. This finding is in accordance with other reports of the antiangiogenic effect of WIN-55,212-2, with a greater than 25% decrease in VEGF release from human and rat glioma cells,12 a 40% decrease from human prostate cancer cells,8 and marked inhibition of VEGF expression in human skin carcinoma.11

In addition to the antiangiogenic effects of cannabinoids observed here and previously, these compounds have been

used successfully in patients with human cancer for the treatment of symptoms resulting from both cancer and antineoplastic therapies, including nausea and vomiting, weight loss, lack of appetite, and pain. Although these benefits have been known for years, it is only recently that the clinical anticancer effects of cannabinoids have been investigated.4

 

Figure 1 Comparison between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in control OSA-8 cells cultured for 48 hours with dimethylsulfoxide (0.1%, v/v) or WIN-55,212-2 (1 µM). Notes: Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. *Statistically significant at P , 0.05

 

Our findings give rise to at least two further lines of research. First is the need to address the role of VEGF in the
establishment of canine osteosarcoma and development of metastasis. Second is the need to elucidate the exact signaling mechanisms governing the inhibitory effects of cannabinoids on VEGF expression, although the involvement of cannabinoid receptors has been suggested by the fact that CB1 and CB2 antagonists block the beneficial action of WIN-55,212-2 in skin carcinoma.12 Further research is currently underway in our laboratory with WIN-55,212-2 and the OSA-8 cell line to assess its precise mechanism of action.

Canine osteosarcoma accounts for approximately 85% of all canine skeletal tumors and, although advances in disease
management have been achieved, 40%–50% of dogs treated by amputation followed by adjuvant therapy survive about one year and only 10%–20% survive more than 2 years.27 In the United States, the number of new cases is estimated to exceed 10,000 per year, representing 10 times more than that in people.18,19 These, in addition to the finding that VEGF levels in human osteosarcoma are indicative of a poor prognosis22 and given the similarities between canine and human osteosarcoma,18 make the canine OSA-8 cell line an attractive in vitro model for assessing the antiangiogenic effects of cannabinoid treatment, and future work will benefit both comparative angiogenesis research and canine patients with cancer.

 

Conclusion
In conclusion, the cannabinoid agonist, WIN-55,212-2, was shown to reduce the expression of VEGF-A in a canine
osteosarcoma cell line. On the basis of the results reported here, we suggest that cannabinoid receptor agonists may have the potential for use as clinical angiogenesis inhibitors. Our results suggest a first step toward the use of cannabinoids as potential adjuvants to chemotherapeutics in the treatment of canine cancers.

 

Acknowledgment
We thank Jaime F Modiano for kindly providing the canine osteosarcoma cell line. This study was supported by the
Merial Veterinary Scholars Program and the Mississippi State University, College of Veterinary Medicine.


Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

 

References
1. Ferrara N, Kerbel RS. Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature.
2005;438:967–974.
2. Ferrara N, Davis-Smyth T. The biology of vascular endothelial growth
factor. Endocr Rev. 1997;18:4–25.
3. Battinelli EM, Markens BA, Italiano JE Jr. Release of angiogenesis
regulatory proteins from platelet alpha granules: modulation
of physiologic and pathologic angiogenesis. Blood. 2011;118:
1359–1369.
4. Velasco G, Sánchez C, Guzmán M. Towards the use of cannabinoids
as antitumor agents. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:436–444.
5. Galve-Roperh I, Sanchez C, Cortez ML, et al. Antitumoral action of
cannabinoids: involvement of sustained ceramide accumulation and
extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Nat Med. 2000;6:
313–319.
6. Carracedo A, Gironella M, Lorente M, et al. Cannabinoids induce
apoptosis of pancreatic tumor cells via endoplasmic reticulum
stress-related genes. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6748–6755.
7. Cianchi R, Papucci L, Schiavone N, et al. Cannabinoid receptor activation
induces apoptosis through tumor necrosis factor alpha-mediated ceramide
de novo synthesis in colon cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:
7691–7700.
8. Sarfaraz S, Afaq F, Adhami VM, et al. Cannabinoid receptor as
a novel target for the treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:
1635–1641.
9. Whyte LS, Ford L, Ridge SA, et al. Cannabinoid and bone: endocan-

nabinoid modulate human osteoclast function in vitro. Br J Pharmacol.
2012;165:2584–2597.
10. Idris AI, Sophocleous A, Landao-Bassonga E, et al. Cannabinoid
receptor type 1 protects against age-related osteoporosis by regulating
osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation in marrow stromal cells. Cell
Metab. 2009;10:139–147.

11. Casanova ML, Blázquez C, Matínez-Palacio, et al. Inhibition of skin
tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo by activation of cannabinoid
receptors. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:43–50.
12. Blázquez C, González-Feria L, Álvarez L, et al. Cannabinoids inhibit
the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in gliomas. Cancer Res.
2004;64:5617–5623.
13. Paoloni M, Khanna C. Translation of new cancer treatments from pet
dogs to humans. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:147–156.
14. Gordon I, Paoloni M, Mazcko C, Khanna C. The Comparative
Oncology Trials Consortium: using spontaneously occurring cancers
in dogs to inform the cancer drug development pathway. PLoS Med.
2009;6:e1000161.
15. Modiano JF, Breen M. Shared pathogenesis of human and canine
tumors – an inextricable link between cancer and evolution. Cancer
Ther. 2008;6:239–246.
16. Uva P, Aurisicchio L, Watters J, et al. Comparative expression pathway
analysis of human and canine mammary tumors. BMC Genomics.
2009;10:135–155.
17. LaRue SM, Withrow SJ, Powers BE, et al. Limb-sparing treatment for
osteosarcoma in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989;195:1734–1744.
18. Withrow SJ, Powers BE, Straw RC, Wilkins RM. Comparative aspects
of osteosarcoma. Dog versus man. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;270:
159–168.
19. Fossey SL, Liao AT, McCleese JK, et al. Characterization of STAT3
activation and expression in canine and human osteosarcoma. BMC
Cancer. 2009;9:81–95.
20. Scott MC, Sarver AL, Gavin KJ, et al. Molecular subtypes of
osteosarcoma identified by reducing tumor heterogeneity through an
interspecies comparative approach. Bone. 2011;49:366–367.
21. Clark JC, Dass CR, Choong PF. A review of clinical and molecular
prognostic factors in osteosarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;134:
281–297.
22. Chun R, Lorimier LP. Update on the biology and management of
canine osteosarcoma. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2003;33:
491–516.
23. Kaya M, Wada T, Akatsuka T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth
factor expression in untreated osteosarcoma is predictive of pulmonary
metastasis and poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:572–577.
24. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the
comparative CT method Thomas. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–1108.
25. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data
using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-∆∆Ct method. Methods.
2001;25:402–408.
26. Yuan JS, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart N Jr. Statistical analysis of real-time
PCR data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:85–96.
27. Phillips B, Powers BE, Dernell WS, et al. Use of single-agent carboplatin
as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in conjunction with amputation for
appendicular osteosarcoma in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2009;45:
33–38


Share this article / Teilen Sie diesen Artikel